<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jurist Prudence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lirapkin.yarinareth.net/2004/02/23/jurist-prudence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lirapkin.yarinareth.net/2004/02/23/jurist-prudence/</link>
	<description>My opinions...if you don't lke 'em, get your own</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 09:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://lirapkin.yarinareth.net/2004/02/23/jurist-prudence/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=432#comment-374</guid>
		<description>Ah, the joy of the "least common denominator" approach to "jury of your peers".  One of the many reasons I think our current legal system is, at best, minorly broken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, the joy of the &#8220;least common denominator&#8221; approach to &#8220;jury of your peers&#8221;.  One of the many reasons I think our current legal system is, at best, minorly broken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Li</title>
		<link>http://lirapkin.yarinareth.net/2004/02/23/jurist-prudence/#comment-375</link>
		<dc:creator>Li</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=432#comment-375</guid>
		<description>Actually, what probably got me excused was my answer to the prosecuting attorney's question "If I convince you beyond a reasonable doubt, would you find the defendant guilty?"  I said that if the *evidence* convinced me beyond a reasonable doubt, I'd find the defendant guilty.  Given the probable situation, I suspect that the defense attorney wanted me out of there in a hurry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, what probably got me excused was my answer to the prosecuting attorney&#8217;s question &#8220;If I convince you beyond a reasonable doubt, would you find the defendant guilty?&#8221;  I said that if the *evidence* convinced me beyond a reasonable doubt, I&#8217;d find the defendant guilty.  Given the probable situation, I suspect that the defense attorney wanted me out of there in a hurry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
